The applicant and respondent separated after a 10-year common law relationship.
The court determined issues of retroactive child support, section 7 expenses, spousal support, access, and the valuation of a jointly held property.
The court imputed income to the respondent for the purpose of calculating retroactive child support due to undeclared cash income.
The applicant's claim for lump sum spousal support was dismissed as the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines suggested nil support and no other basis was established.
The court found the parties engaged in a joint family venture regarding their home and valued the respondent's 50% interest at the date of trial using a 'value survived' approach.
The court also established an access schedule including Wednesday overnights and alternate weekends.
