The plaintiff sought leave to appeal a decision dismissing his motion for an interlocutory injunction against the Canada Revenue Agency.
The motion judge had found that the Federal Court had exclusive jurisdiction and that the plaintiff failed to establish irreparable harm.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for leave to appeal, finding that the plaintiff failed to satisfy the test under Rule 62.02(4) as there was no issue of broad general importance and it was not desirable to grant leave given the parallel proceeding in the Federal Court.
