The plaintiff brought a motion seeking the production of unredacted copies of documents listed in the defendant's affidavit of documents, which related to an internal investigation leading to her dismissal.
The defendant sought a confidentiality order over the documents, arguing they contained personal information of non-parties.
The court ordered the production of the unredacted documents, finding the defendant failed to demonstrate that disclosure would cause significant harm or that the redacted information was clearly irrelevant.
The court also declined to impose a formal confidentiality order, concluding that the deemed undertaking rule and an undertaking provided by the plaintiff's counsel were sufficient to protect the defendant's interests.
