The plaintiff was injured while exiting a taxi and sued her insurer for unidentified automobile coverage after failing to identify the driver.
The insurer brought a motion for summary judgment, arguing the plaintiff did not take reasonable steps to identify the driver and failed to provide proper notice.
The court granted the motion, finding that the driver's identity could have been ascertained with reasonable diligence through the taxi dispatch company's records, meaning the vehicle did not qualify as an 'unidentified automobile' under the policy.
