The appellant challenged an appellate ruling that had quashed a labour board decision and remitted labour code complaints for reconsideration.
The Court held the board had considered the relevant statutory provisions and factual record, and its interpretation was reasonable and entitled to deference on judicial review.
It reaffirmed that administrative decision-makers need not expressly address every possible interpretive nuance raised by parties.
Viewed as a whole and in light of the record, the board's reasons met the reasonableness standard.
The appeal was allowed, the appellate judgment was set aside, and the trial-level judgment was restored with costs.
