1 total
The applicant's s. 525 detention review was dismissed as the proposed release plan did not mitigate secondary and tertiary ground concerns.
The applicant sought a s. 525 Criminal Code detention review, arguing that his continued detention was no longer justified due to a material change in circumstances, including new disclosure and an enhanced release plan with new sureties.
The court dismissed the application, finding that the proposed release plan did not sufficiently mitigate the secondary and tertiary ground concerns, particularly given the applicant's alleged repeated breaches of non-communication orders and the serious nature of the human trafficking and prostitution-related charges.
The court also ruled that the new evidence regarding the complainant's post-offence conduct was inadmissible without a s. 276 application.
