The court heard three procedural motions in a $100 million commercial dispute involving allegations of breach of contract and breach of confidence.
The defendants moved to compel the plaintiffs to answer undertakings and refusals from discovery, which the court largely granted, ordering the plaintiffs to provide development timelines and material facts supporting their group enterprise claims.
The plaintiffs brought two motions: one to strike the defendants' response to a request to admit an incomplete affidavit, and another to compel updated answers regarding expert witnesses.
The court dismissed both of the plaintiffs' motions, noting the defendants' ongoing obligation to correct discovery answers under the Rules of Civil Procedure.
