The applicants moved to set aside two orders regarding their claimed beneficial interest in their son and daughter-in-law's matrimonial home.
The first order converted their application into an action, and the second ex parte order vested exclusive title in the daughter-in-law after the applicants failed to comply with the first order's filing deadlines.
The Divisional Court set aside the ex parte order under Rule 37.14(1)(a) because the applicants had indicated an intention to appeal, but affirmed the initial order as the motion to set it aside was not brought forthwith.
