The appellant appealed convictions for firearm-related offences.
The firearm, ammunition, and an oversized magazine were seized from the appellant's home pursuant to a search warrant obtained after a threatening interaction between the appellant and his associates and a restaurant owner.
The appellant challenged the warrant through a Garofoli application, arguing the affiant mischaracterized the video evidence in the information to obtain and that the trial judge misapprehended the video surveillance evidence.
The Court of Appeal found no mischaracterization in the ITO and no error in the trial judge's assessment of the video evidence, dismissing the appeal.
