This decision addresses competing motions for temporary parenting time and decision-making responsibility between separated parents.
The applicant mother sought primary residence and supervised parenting for the father, while the father sought to maintain the status quo of equal time-sharing.
The court reviewed the evidence, including allegations of family violence, the children’s adjustment, and the parties’ conduct, and ultimately ordered a 2-2-5-5 parenting schedule, declined to order supervision, and directed the parties to arrange therapy for the child L1.
The court also excluded surreptitious recordings and improper reply affidavits.
