The appellant appealed a trial judge's order for indefinite supervised access to the children of the marriage, arguing it made obtaining future unsupervised access practically and legally impossible.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's exceptional order was supported by evidence of the appellant's attempts to manipulate the children and subject them to repeated professional assessments.
The Court noted the order does not preclude the appellant from seeking to vary the terms of access in the future upon proof of a material change in circumstances.
