The moving party mother brought a motion for contempt against the responding party father, alleging he breached a final order by unreasonably withholding consent to enroll their child in hockey and refusing to take the child to games and practices during his parenting time.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the order only required consent prior to registration, which the mother bypassed by enrolling the child unilaterally.
Furthermore, the order did not clearly compel the father to take the child to the activity.
The court noted that a motion to change, rather than a contempt motion, was the appropriate procedure to address the issue.
