The applicant, a unit owner and former board member, brought an application against the condominium corporation alleging oppression and seeking the removal of the board and the appointment of an inspector.
The applicant claimed the board acted unilaterally and without authority in entering into contracts for building recladding and a loan agreement, and failed to properly document meetings.
The court dismissed the application, finding that the board met its standard of care, the recladding was a necessary repair under the Condominium Act, and the applicant, having been on the board during the relevant times, was fully aware of and participated in the decisions.
The court found no oppressive conduct or financial impropriety.
