Sentencing for multiple voyeurism offences, making child pornography, sexual assault, and a firearms offence arising from surreptitious recordings of women and a child in a family home over two distinct periods.
The court treated the bathroom-camera offences and child pornography offence as the most serious conduct, emphasizing the invasion of sexual integrity, the victims' reasonable expectation of privacy, and a profound breach of trust within the home.
A conditional sentence was rejected because denunciation and deterrence predominated and a community-based sentence would depreciate the gravity of the offences.
Applying proportionality and totality, the court imposed a global custodial sentence of 30 months, reduced by 10 days' credit for pre-trial custody.
