Karakatsanis J.A.

The appellants appealed the trial judge's order for a re-trial, which was based on a finding that the jury's answers regarding damages were inconsistent.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the jury's answers were not inconsistent and that there was evidence to support their findings on past and future wage loss and general damages.

The jury's verdict was reinstated, and the issue of costs was remitted to the trial judge.

The appellants appealed an order of the motion judge.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error by the motion judge and noting that the appellants' failure to appeal a prior order provided a complete answer to their position.

Costs of $5,000 were awarded to the respondents.