During an examination conducted by a Labour Relations Officer, the intervener objected to the applicant's cross-examination questions, arguing they improperly referenced non-existent testimony to cast doubt on the witness's credibility.
The intervener submitted a letter confirming the objection.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board declined to intervene, noting that its practice is to deal with such objections after receiving the Officer's report and the parties' submissions.
The Board further observed that questions raising issues of credibility are not generally improper.
