The appellant challenged a family law decision upholding a trial judgment that granted the respondent unsupervised access, found the appellant in contempt, and awarded costs against her.
The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge carefully reviewed the evidence, made findings of fact amply supported by the record, applied the relevant legal principles, and properly exercised discretion on costs.
The appeal was characterized as an improper attempt to re-try the case and was dismissed in all respects.
The cross-appeal was also rejected, except that any remaining issues were left to be addressed in the Ontario Court on proper application.
