This family law trial addressed decision-making authority, parenting time, and child support for the parties' daughter.
The mother sought sole decision-making authority and primary residence, while the father requested the same and sought to reduce his child support obligations.
The court found that the father had engaged in coercive control, unilateral decision-making, and verbal abuse, which were contrary to the child's best interests.
Ultimately, the court granted the mother sole decision-making authority and primary residence, maintained the father's alternate weekend parenting time under strict conditions, and ordered retroactive and ongoing child support based on imputed incomes.
