The defendant was charged with sexual assault alleged to have occurred in February 2018.
After evidence was heard over five days in February 2020, the defendant requested that closing submissions be heard by audioconference rather than in person, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and the geographic dispersal of parties and counsel.
The Crown opposed but remained circumspect.
The court considered jurisdiction, the open court principle, and practical considerations under Part XXII.01 of the Criminal Code, ultimately granting the request to proceed by audioconference supplemented by written submissions, subject to specific guidelines regarding observers, conduct, and notification procedures.