The society brought a motion for temporary care and custody, seeking to place a child with his maternal grandmother due to his sexualized behaviours towards his younger sister.
The parents sought to have all children placed in their temporary care and custody subject to supervision.
The court found that while there was a risk of harm, the society did not meet its onus to show that the children could not be adequately protected by a supervision order.
The court ordered that all children be placed in the temporary care and custody of the parents subject to strict terms of supervision, including the use of cameras, door alarms, and the requirement that the child sleep in the parents' bedroom.
