The parties separated after a 30-year cohabitation.
At trial, the court determined the equalization of net family property and spousal support.
The applicant sought to include a $100,000 promissory note as a debt and exclude unvested stock options from his net family property.
The court drew an adverse inference from the applicant's failure to call expert evidence, excluding the promissory note debt and including the post-separation realized value of the stock options.
The court also awarded the respondent ongoing spousal support of $5,200 per month, recognizing both compensatory and non-compensatory entitlement arising from the long-term marriage.
