The applicant, convicted of sexual assault, brought a Charter motion under s. 24(1) seeking an individual exemption from mandatory registration under the Sex Offender Information Registration Act (SOIRA).
Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Ndhlovu, which struck down mandatory registration but suspended the declaration of invalidity, the applicant argued the registration was overbroad and grossly disproportionate to his circumstances.
The court dismissed the application, finding the applicant did not fall into the lowest risk category of offenders and failed to establish that the impacts of registration on his liberty were grossly disproportionate to the objective of preventing and investigating sexual offences.