The self-represented appellant brought a motion in the Superior Court of Justice seeking to appeal a case conference endorsement issued by a judge of the Divisional Court.
The appellant also requested an adjournment to submit new evidence of alleged fraud by the Landlord and Tenant Board, and argued he was not properly served with the respondents' motion materials because the email did not address him correctly.
The court denied the adjournment and found service was valid.
The motion was dismissed on the basis that a judge of the Superior Court has no jurisdiction under section 21 of the Courts of Justice Act to set aside or vary a case conference endorsement made by a judge of the Divisional Court.
