The appellants appealed a trial decision finding that they wrongfully dismissed the respondent.
They argued the trial judge erred in law by failing to analyze why the respondent's manipulation of a security camera did not constitute dishonesty justifying termination for just cause under the McKinley framework.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge explicitly concluded the respondent did not engage in dishonest behaviour or falsify work hours, and correctly held that manipulating the camera alone did not constitute just cause.
