The Crown appealed an order staying criminal charges on the basis of the respondent's health and alleged inability to defend himself.
The Court of Appeal held that the evidentiary record did not establish that the respondent would probably be unable to defend himself or that the trial process would probably cause significant harm to his health.
The stay was found to be premature, with the court noting that fitness and health concerns could be revisited if they arose during trial.
The appeal was allowed and the matter was remitted for trial.