The defendant was charged with impaired operation of a motor vehicle, operation with a blood alcohol concentration exceeding 80 milligrams per 100 milliliters of blood, and possession of marijuana.
The Crown established impaired operation through evidence of erratic driving and physical indicators of impairment.
However, the defendant was acquitted of the "Over 80" charge based on the mandatory practice of truncation of breath test results.
The court found that the defendant's lowest breath sample reading of 84 milligrams must be truncated to 80 milligrams in accordance with established training protocols, creating a reasonable doubt.
The defendant was convicted of impaired operation and possession of marijuana.