The Crown brought a voluntariness application to admit the accused's videotaped statement to police, while the accused brought a Charter application seeking to exclude evidence obtained during a search of his home and computer, alleging breaches of ss. 8, 9, and 10(b).
The accused was charged with child luring after communicating online with an undercover officer posing as a 14-year-old girl.
The court found the videotaped statement was voluntary and admissible.
While the court found a s. 8 breach regarding the obtaining of subscriber information and a s. 10(b breach regarding pre-caution statements, it admitted the evidence under s. 24(2) of the Charter, finding the police acted in good faith and the evidence was highly reliable and crucial to the prosecution.