The applicants sought specific performance of an agreement of purchase and sale for a property containing a chapel, asserting its uniqueness for their business.
The respondents did not contest the agreement's enforceability but challenged the availability of specific performance.
The court found the applicants' evidence insufficient to establish the property's uniqueness, as required by *Semelhago v. Paramadevan*, lacking details on the property, the nature of the business, or a search for similar properties.
The motion for specific performance was dismissed, and the parties were directed to address damages.
