The parties brought cross-motions for temporary orders regarding parenting time, decision-making responsibility, and daycare for their three-year-old child.
The court granted the applicant sole decision-making responsibility due to the respondent's poor communication and controlling behaviour.
The court maintained the status quo for parenting time, finding no compelling reason to change it on a temporary basis, but ordered the respondent not to consume alcohol or drugs during his parenting time.
The child was ordered to remain in full-time daycare, with an exception allowing the respondent to care for the child on his parenting days if he is not working.
