The appellant appealed a Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) decision denying her entitlement to post-104-week income replacement benefits under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no errors of law.
The court affirmed that new binding case law does not constitute new evidence for a reconsideration request, and held that the insurer's denial letter adequately complied with the statutory notice requirements under s. 37(4) of the SABS.
