The applicant father sought an order for unsupervised parenting time with his two young children, H. (8) and O. (4), after seven months of no contact following his arrest on serious criminal charges, including assault and sexual assault.
The respondent mother opposed, insisting on supervised parenting time due to concerns about family violence and the children's safety.
The court, applying the best interests of the child principle and considering family violence factors under the Divorce Act, found that supervised parenting time was necessary.
The father's request for unsupervised access was denied.
The motion was adjourned to allow the father to propose suitable supervisors, who must provide affidavits confirming their willingness and duty to prioritize the children's best interests.
The court also requested the Office of the Children's Lawyer to reconsider its involvement to conduct a clinical investigation.
