Following the dismissal of the appellant's appeal from a Small Claims Court decision, both parties sought costs.
The respondent sought costs on a substantial indemnity scale, arguing the appeal was frivolous and noting the appellant's scandalous allegations against the court.
The court awarded costs to the respondent on a partial indemnity scale, fixing the amount at $3,500, taking into account the $7,200 claimed in the original action.
The court also reprimanded the self-represented appellant, who is a lawyer by training, for her disrespectful and unfounded attacks on the judiciary.
