The applicant filed a human rights complaint alleging discrimination and reprisals by her union.
In an interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several preliminary issues.
The adjudicator ruled that the scope of the application was limited to the allegations raised in the original complaint and could not include post-complaint events without a formal amendment.
Two personal respondents were removed on consent after the union accepted vicarious liability, while a third remained due to specific allegations against him.
The Tribunal also made case management directions regarding the order of evidence and required the parties to provide detailed witness statements.