The defendants brought a motion for an order compelling the plaintiff to attend an in-person vocational assessment with a non-health practitioner and to provide raw test data from previous neuropsychological assessments to the defence expert.
The plaintiff opposed the motion.
The court held that it has inherent jurisdiction to order an examination by a non-health practitioner to ensure trial fairness, and that the raw test data was relevant and necessary for the defence expert to prepare his report.
The motion was granted.
