The appellants appealed an order dismissing their application regarding a municipal meeting held on March 29, 2000.
The Court of Appeal upheld the lower court's finding that the meeting complied with the spirit and purpose of the Planning Act.
Any minor deficiencies were deemed de minimis.
The court declined to hear a new argument regarding the County's obligations under the Planning Act because it raised factual issues not explored below.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
