Judicial review dismissed as RPD reasonably found the refugee claim lacked a credible basis.
The applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) finding that his refugee claim had no credible basis.
The RPD found significant inconsistencies and omissions in the applicant's evidence regarding his delayed claim and core allegations of persecution in India.
The Federal Court concluded the RPD's assessment was reasonable and dismissed the application.
Judicial review dismissed; family separation fear does not ground refugee claim.
The applicants, citizens of Jordan, sought judicial review of a Refugee Protection Division (RPD) decision denying their claims for refugee protection.
The RPD found that fear of family separation does not present a nexus to a Convention ground and that there was no credible risk of loss of Jordanian citizenship.
The Federal Court held the RPD's decision was reasonable and dismissed the application.
Judicial review dismissed as the RAD reasonably found no nexus and adequate state protection.
The principal applicant applied for judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision dismissing his appeal.
The RAD had found no nexus to a Convention ground, noting the applicant feared an individual because the applicant had assaulted him and was suspected of reporting him to the police, rather than because he refused to perform criminal acts for him.
The Federal Court held the RAD's conclusion on nexus was reasonable.
The Court also held it was reasonable for the RAD to conclude the applicants had not rebutted the presumption of state protection in Italy or Kosovo.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.
