On the first day of trial, the plaintiff sought to amend her Statement of Claim to advance a $240,000 claim for damages.
The proceeding was originally commenced as an application under the Solicitors Act to assess a solicitor's bill, which was later ordered to be treated as an action.
The court held that an order under Rule 38.10 does not retroactively convert an application into an action for all purposes, and the proposed amendment constituted a new cause of action for damages.
Because the plaintiff knew of the potential claim years prior, the amendment was statute-barred under the Limitations Act and the motion was dismissed.