2 total
The court awarded substantial indemnity costs after finding the appeal was an obvious delay tactic.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario issued a costs endorsement following an appeal brought by the Debtor, Wayne Biggar.
The Court found that Mr. Biggar's appeal was brought to the wrong court and constituted an obvious delay tactic.
As a result, the Creditors, Jack Pinder, Victor Dusik, and Innotech Safety Solutions Inc., were awarded substantial indemnity costs fixed at $11,500, inclusive of disbursements and applicable taxes, payable by Mr. Biggar within five days.
The Court of Appeal quashed an appeal from a garnishment order, finding it was an interlocutory step in an ongoing action.
The respondents (creditors) moved to quash an appeal brought by the appellant (debtor) from a garnishment order, arguing that the order was interlocutory and therefore not appealable to the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal agreed, finding that the garnishment order was an interlocutory step in an ongoing oppression action, not a final disposition of the parties' rights or a discrete proceeding.
Consequently, the Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal, which properly lay with the Divisional Court.
The appeal was quashed.
