The appellants challenged a trial judgment in a personal injury action, arguing principally that the trial judge erred in admitting CAS records and applied the wrong onus.
The Court of Appeal held that, even if the hearsay objection had merit, the adverse credibility finding was strongly supported by other evidence and no substantial wrong or miscarriage resulted.
The court also rejected the onus argument because the finding that the bus was properly brought to a stop was a complete answer.
The threshold issue did not need to be addressed.
The appeal was dismissed with costs if demanded.
