The applicant appealed the Township's refusal of a minor variance application seeking retroactive approval for an oversized viewing deck and storage shed built within the required shoreline setbacks of Long Lake.
The applicant argued the oversized deck was necessary for a family member's accessibility needs.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the variances failed the four-part test under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act.
The Tribunal preferred the Township's expert evidence that the structures posed ecological risks, circumvented proactive buffer policies, and represented overdevelopment of the shoreline inconsistent with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
