The appellants appealed an order requiring them to remove satellite dishes from their exclusive use patio terrace.
They argued that the condominium's Declaration prohibited all satellite dishes, making the corporation's rule permitting a specific common satellite provider discriminatory.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the corporation's interpretation of its Declaration to permit a common satellite system was not unreasonable.
The court also rejected the argument that the rule was unenforceable due to lack of visibility, as the appellants failed to adduce evidence on that issue.
