The applicant requested a reconsideration of a preliminary issue decision which found that an assault at an automobile repair shop did not constitute an 'accident' under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
The Tribunal dismissed the request because the applicant failed to specify the grounds for reconsideration under Rule 18.2.
Furthermore, on the merits, the Tribunal found no significant error of law or fact in the original decision, which correctly concluded that the assault was an intervening act breaking the chain of causation between the use of the automobile and the applicant's impairments.
