The respondent requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision finding he discriminated against the applicant with respect to housing accommodation based on her receipt of public assistance.
The respondent argued he was denied natural justice because the hearing was not bifurcated as initially directed, and he sought to introduce new character evidence.
The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding the proposed evidence was not new or determinative, and there was no denial of natural justice as the respondent had a full opportunity to address the issue of remedy at the hearing.
