The defendant general contractor brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiff subcontractor's $11.1 million delay claim, arguing the plaintiff failed to provide strict contractual notice of the delay.
The plaintiff argued that the defendant had actual notice and that strict compliance was not required given the surrounding circumstances.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the issues of notice, credibility regarding backdated letters, and the complex factual matrix of the construction delay raised genuine issues requiring a full trial.