The applicant and respondent separated after a high-conflict incident.
The applicant sought sole decision-making responsibility, primary residence of their three children, and child support.
The respondent sought equal parenting time and joint decision-making.
The court found the respondent's aggressive behaviour and inability to communicate effectively precluded joint decision-making and equal parenting time.
The court ordered that the children primarily reside with the applicant, granted the applicant sole decision-making responsibility, and ordered the respondent to pay retroactive and ongoing child support.
