The applicant father brought a motion to immediately implement the recommendations of an Office of the Children's Lawyer section 112 report on a temporary basis pending trial.
The report recommended that the parties' twin daughters reside primarily with the applicant.
The respondent mother opposed the motion, arguing that the status quo should be maintained.
The court dismissed the motion to change custody, finding no urgent situation requiring immediate intervention and emphasizing that untested professional reports should rarely be implemented on a temporary basis.
However, the court did order that neither party audio or videotape the children or each other for litigation purposes.
