The appellant appealed a decision dismissing his application to vary spousal and child support obligations.
He sought to reduce his support obligations to zero, arguing a material change in circumstances due to an inability to work.
The trial judge found he was working intermittently for cash and was capable of working in a supervisory capacity in the construction industry, imputing an annual income of $40,000.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the trial judge's assessment of the evidence, including expert reports, and dismissed the appeal.