The accused was charged with impaired care or control of a motor vehicle and care or control with excess blood alcohol following a complaint of erratic driving.
A civilian witness with police experience observed the accused's vehicle weaving across lanes at excessive speeds.
Police attended the accused's residence and observed signs of impairment.
The accused was arrested and provided breath samples showing excess blood alcohol.
The accused brought a Charter application challenging the lawfulness of the arrest, detention, and search.
The court rejected all Charter arguments, finding the police conduct lawful and the evidence admissible.
The court convicted the accused on both charges based on the totality of evidence including the civilian witness observations, police observations of impairment indicators, and the breath sample results.