The accused applied under s. 520 of the Criminal Code to review a detention order.
The accused presented new alibi evidence suggesting he was in another city at the time of one of the alleged offences.
However, the court noted that if the alibi were true, the accused was simultaneously in breach of two recognizances.
The court found that the impact of the new evidence on the probability of conviction was balanced by its negative impact on the court's ability to trust the accused to comply with release terms.
The application was dismissed.
