3 total
Motion for leave to appeal granted with costs in the cause.
The moving party brought a motion for leave to appeal the decision of the lower court judge.
The Divisional Court granted the motion for leave to appeal, with costs of $2,500 payable in the discretion of the appeal panel.
The court dismissed a show cause order against counsel who submitted AI-generated fake case citations.
This decision addresses a show cause proceeding against counsel, Jisuh Lee, for submitting a factum containing fictitious case citations generated by artificial intelligence in a civil estates matter.
The court reviews the duties of counsel to verify authorities, the new certification rule for facta, and the professional and ethical implications of AI use in legal practice.
The court finds that Ms. Lee has adequately purged any contempt through her admissions, apology, corrective actions, and commitment to further professional development, and dismisses the show cause order on conditions.
The court set aside a fraudulent divorce order and ordered counsel to show cause for submitting AI-hallucinated case law.
This decision addresses two issues: (1) the use of artificial intelligence in legal submissions, specifically the submission of facta containing non-existent or misrepresented case law, and (2) the merits of a motion concerning the administration of the estate of Xiang Guo Li, including the setting aside of a divorce order, estate trustee issues, and the rights of competing spouses.
The court set aside the divorce order for fraud and duress, ordered disclosure and administration steps for the estate, and required the applicant's counsel to show cause why she should not be cited for contempt for submitting false authorities.